author image
24 Hours With The iPhone 3G
Jul 15 2008 • Written By Duane Storey • 8 Comments

I‘ve been messing around with the iPhone 3G pretty much non-stop for the last 24 hours. For the most part, it has exceeded my expectations.

iPhone 3G Activation

First, being able to check your email or surf the web from any location is a pretty awesome feature. For example, today I was at the beach with some friends and we noticed that the tide was slowly creeping up the shore. I quickly fired up Safari, did a Google search for “Vancouver Tide Table”, and determined that high tide was in about two hours.

iPhone Application StoreAs most people know, the iPhone 2.0 firmware brings with it the iPhone application store. I’ve already purchased two applications, the premium Twitterific app and the Flickr app. The Twitterific app is a bit more polished, but the Flickr app is fully functional and will probably make life with Flickr that much easier.

One application that is notably missing is something to share your current location with your friends. The AGPS system in the iPhone works surprisingly well with the Google maps application, but I have yet to have it work well with anything else. I updated my location in Twitter today using the Twitterific application, only to realize that it was about 2 or 3 miles off when someone viewed the location from my Twitter profile. Ideally, I want a way to send my GPS coordinates to someone so they can find me. I was trying to tell John Biehler how to get to the beach we were at today, when I really should have been able to fire him off a URL of where I was and have him walk right up to me. Perhaps that functionality is buried in the iPhone somewhere, but I haven’t found it yet.

I was pretty worried with the battery life yesterday after I picked it up. It was 50% full when I purchased it, and I nearly ran it down to 0 by the time I got home. I gave it a full charge overnight, and was relieved when I got home tonight and it was still nearly full. So battery life seems to at least be good enough to do a full day or random calling and surfing.

One disappointing aspect is that the iPhone 3G doesn’t appear to work with my iPod dock. The current dock I have has worked for three generations of iPods (the original, the nano and the touch), so I was disappointed when I plugged it into my stereo dock as night only to be told by the iPhone that it wasn’t compatible. I can’t really imagine a scenario where Apple couldn’t make it work with the old dock if they wanted to (the pin configurations are the same), so I can only conclude that the purposefully broke it so people would be forced to buy new docks for the iPhone 3G.

I also signed up for a trial Mobile Me account tonight. Mobile Me is Apple’s new web-based service that can synchronize content between Mac devices in real-time. One nice thing about the Mobile Me service is that it operates off a PUSH delivery system, which means that it automatically sends data to all devices immediately after the data is changed. The opposite of that is a PULL system (often called polling or fetching), where each device periodically checks for updates, even if none exist. The PUSH system is obviously far more efficient, and ultimately uses less battery life (since no data is transferred when no updates are available). I have to say, it’s pretty cool seeing your iPhone chirp about 3 seconds after you send an email to your Mobile Me address. I also updated a pile of contacts on my Laptop to see what would happen on my iPhone. Without any intervention, the contacts on my iPhone automatically changed as well within about 15 seconds of finishing synchronizing them on my laptop. Pretty cool.

Unfortunately, the Mobile Me website seems borked right now, and it won’t let me log in using my credentials. Until then, I won’t be able to see how it compares against Google’s suite of products.

iPhone 3G Data UsageIn terms of data usage, it would seem I haven’t used all that much. In the 36 hours or so that I’ve had the device, I’ve only used 40MB worth of data. I would consider myself in the “power user” category, and I’m actually a bit surprised that it’s so low. I imagine once I start uploading photos routinely it will climb, but at my current rate I’ll barely hit 1GB worth of data this month.

One thing I have noticed however is that the user interface seems a bit sluggist on the iPhone 3G compared to my iPod touch. I played around with John Biehler’s device today, and although it seemed slightly snappier, you can see a slight delay when bouncing between contacts or adding new ones. I’ve been told that the original iPhone firmwares also had speed issues, and slowly improved with each iteration. So hopefully the next version of the 3G firmware will make the UI a bit peppier.

All in all, I’m extremely happy with my purchase, and would definitely recommend it to anyone looking for a mobile computing device. Surprisingly, I haven’t really made that many calls with it since I’ve gotten it. In fact, I consider the ability to surf and interact wirelessly over 3G the device’s main selling point.

** Update – Also, the iPhone 3G doesn’t appear to support the 802.11n. That’s pretty disappointing considering every Mac product in my house is using it, including my new Airport base station. The only way I can make my iPod touch work with it is to reconfigure my router to do a+b as well as n, but that means I can’t use the 802.11n in wide mode. Maybe I’ll bridge my router at home with another 802.11b router I have, but that’s a huge pain in the ass. I’m really surprised 802.11n isn’t supported on the iPhone 3G.

8 Comments

  1. “I?m really surprised 802.11n isn?t supported on the iPhone 3G.”

    Ummmm … dude, 802.11n requires a minimum of two receiving antennas/transmitting antennas/radios for its MIMO array, and you don’t see a massive benefit from that, you need at least the three antenna sets that the Airport base station has.

    Personally, I would be utterly flabbergasted if anybody anywhere came up with any scenario whatsoever in which the tradeoffs of engineering a MIMO array dedicated to WiFi into a cellphone could be characterized as anything other than “insanely stupid”.

    The iPod touch, now, there could be a case made for it there…

  2. Duane Storey

    BNC Development Guru

    July 15th, 2008

    Hmm, when you phrase it like that, it does seem rather stupid. It still is rather unfortunate that in order to use it with a Wireless N airport, you basically have to disable the wireless N and pop it into a slow mixed mode.

  3. Dale Mugford

    BNC Design Guru

    July 15th, 2008

    Screw mixed modes… didn’t you read my post, Duane?

  4. Duane Storey

    duane
    July 15th, 2008

    Yah, but that solution requires two routers. Obviously it works, but I think telling people they need to go out and get another router isn’t really a great solution. The thing is, you can’t download an app over 10MB without Wi-Fi, and in my current setup, my iPhone can’t even see the wireless N router. So basically I have to spend time bridging the network with another router (not everyone has two kicking around), or move my airport into mixed mode. Both of those solutions are less than ideal in my opinion.

  5. Duane don’t you have a building full of open wifi? Why not leech off someone else with the iPhone and leave the N alone!

  6. Jordan Ess

    July 18th, 2008

    I too was disappointed with the lack of 802.11n support and not because of the speed but because of network compatibility even pseudo 802.11n compatibility would have been just fine. I supported Dale’s idea, although I didn’t know that until now and have two routers running. Maybe I live in a bubble of techno-privilege but, I find it hard to believe any user doesn’t have an old router gathering dust. Cross compatibility with this topology is an issue that hasn’t been addressed, for example I have my Apple TV and laptop on my 802.11n 5.4 Ghz network and my older D-Link unreliable and formerly useless 802.11g router for my iPhone/iPods. The iPhone has a much stronger radio signal than a laptop (22 dBm) which would in theory allow my 5.4Ghx network to meet my coverage needs if Apple desired it to do so.

    Linking the systems/netowrk together so that my iPhone can be used as a remote for Apple TV works just fine inter-network but not to control iTunes on the laptop when the networks are different. On my home network I used iWeb to create a website with my iTunes library on it and can stream all my content from my laptop/ air port disk to my iPhone inter-network. I cannot “see” my Apple TV when I am on my 802.11g network either. It seems it is really is up to the users to find and figure out what you can do with all of this equipment and the network topology that Apple is forcing upon its customers, to make it worth the money it costs. Why should it be so hard? Despite the necessity and obvious benefits of this arrangement advice and know-how is really scant. Come on Apple, either let go of the reins or step up to the plate!

  7. Dale Mugford

    BNC Design Guru

    July 18th, 2008

    @ Jordan: you need to make sure that the d-link is just bridging to the airport network- have the airport extreme assign a static ip to the mac address of the dlink, and make sure the dlink isn’t dishing out ips.

    Once the proper bridge is working the extreme will take care of everything and you’ll see all the computers and services on your network.

  8. Thanks Dale, it’s all up and running now!