<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Blog-Roll Of The Future</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bravenewcode.com/2008/05/the-blog-roll-of-the-future/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bravenewcode.com/2008/05/the-blog-roll-of-the-future/</link>
	<description>You dream it up, we code it to life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 14:14:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duane Storey</title>
		<link>http://www.bravenewcode.com/2008/05/the-blog-roll-of-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Duane Storey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 01:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bravenewcode.com/?p=111#comment-366</guid>
		<description>Just curious why you wouldn&#039;t want it?   I think you have to look at it like something different than a blog roll, that is, something that doesn&#039;t necessarily represent just your friends.   In that context, I would think showing a link to wikipedia is relevant, since you linked to it in an article.  But I&#039;m interested to hear why you wouldn&#039;t want it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious why you wouldn&#8217;t want it?   I think you have to look at it like something different than a blog roll, that is, something that doesn&#8217;t necessarily represent just your friends.   In that context, I would think showing a link to wikipedia is relevant, since you linked to it in an article.  But I&#8217;m interested to hear why you wouldn&#8217;t want it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://www.bravenewcode.com/2008/05/the-blog-roll-of-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-365</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 01:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bravenewcode.com/?p=111#comment-365</guid>
		<description>This is a great concept for contextualizing outbound links.  If it were to be some sort of automated wordpress plugin, it would need to take into account sites that are linked to often but which we might want to exclude from the &#039;blogroll&#039;.  An example would be Wikipedia.  I link regularly to wiki articles, but would never want it on my blogroll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great concept for contextualizing outbound links.  If it were to be some sort of automated wordpress plugin, it would need to take into account sites that are linked to often but which we might want to exclude from the &#8216;blogroll&#8217;.  An example would be Wikipedia.  I link regularly to wiki articles, but would never want it on my blogroll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris Mann</title>
		<link>http://www.bravenewcode.com/2008/05/the-blog-roll-of-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 00:38:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bravenewcode.com/?p=111#comment-162</guid>
		<description>Combining this with people that comment on your blog would be interesting -- the admin section could let you tweak weighting between your outgoing links, people that comment, and people that trackback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Combining this with people that comment on your blog would be interesting &#8212; the admin section could let you tweak weighting between your outgoing links, people that comment, and people that trackback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: buKit</title>
		<link>http://www.bravenewcode.com/2008/05/the-blog-roll-of-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-154</link>
		<dc:creator>buKit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 19:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bravenewcode.com/?p=111#comment-154</guid>
		<description>Duane,

I agree. I&#039;d bailed on the blogroll feature long ago, but was still sorta searching for a way to give &#039;shout-outs&#039; to folks.

Seems like what you&#039;re talking about is basically sort of like a &#039;recent comments&#039; display type dealy only with recent links...er something.

Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Duane,</p>
<p>I agree. I&#8217;d bailed on the blogroll feature long ago, but was still sorta searching for a way to give &#8216;shout-outs&#8217; to folks.</p>
<p>Seems like what you&#8217;re talking about is basically sort of like a &#8216;recent comments&#8217; display type dealy only with recent links&#8230;er something.</p>
<p>Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kulpreet singh</title>
		<link>http://www.bravenewcode.com/2008/05/the-blog-roll-of-the-future/comment-page-1/#comment-153</link>
		<dc:creator>kulpreet singh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 18:46:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bravenewcode.com/?p=111#comment-153</guid>
		<description>Good ideas Duane. We need to look at WordPress as a whole from another angle. Many people out there are starting to use it beyond &quot;posts&quot; and &quot;blogroll&quot; and making brilliant innovations, which I think is great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good ideas Duane. We need to look at WordPress as a whole from another angle. Many people out there are starting to use it beyond &#8220;posts&#8221; and &#8220;blogroll&#8221; and making brilliant innovations, which I think is great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

